Skip to content
Rota Nacional

Radar ·

Why RL training may be more fragile than SFT

Published on November 5, 2025, the article explains how noisy feedback and complex infrastructure can destabilize reinforcement learning (RL) training.

In a publication dated November 5, 2025, the author argues that supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) may share a form of loss function but differ in practice. RL depends on noisy feedback and more complex infrastructure for rollouts, log-probabilities, and reward shaping, factors that can destabilize training.

The article highlights data-quality and infrastructure risks that engineers should monitor in RL systems. To verify the argument and its details, consult the original publication and check the definitions and evidence it presents; the available summary specifies no measurements or quantitative results.

Get new articles

Privacy, AI engineering and security in your inbox.

Rota Nacional

Bring privacy into your workflow.

30 days, no card, with a starting quota. After that, Pix credit from R$ 5,00.

Try free